Don was convicted in a manufactured rape
with no evidence whatsoever and coerced into
a guilty plea by the lies of a public defender.
He originally pled not
guilty, then was coerced into a plea bargain that was based
on the threat of losing a jury trial because of the prosecutorís evidence.
As it turns out, there was no evidence. And no bargain.
Prosecutor lies to the judge, and tries to cover it up.
|The Sixth Amendment, which is applicable to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, see In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 273-74 (1948), guarantees a criminal defendant a fundamental right to be clearly informed of the nature and cause of the charges against him. In order to determine whether a defendant has received constitutionally adequate notice, the court looks first to the information. James v. Borg, 24 F.3d 20, 24 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 333 (1994). 'The principal purpose of the information is to provide the defendant with a description of the charges against him in sufficient detail to enable him to prepare his defense.' Id.|
was predicated on an appeal to racism rather than reason,
and concealment rather than disclosure.
To permit convictions to stand, which have as their sole foundation
About IIAO | Prisoner News | How to Help | Articles | Letters | FAQ | Links | Contact Us
©2003-2006 IIAO Inc., All Rights Reserved